No, it won't mess things up. Each process gets idle notifications. IBO's
passive processing yields generously and Windows shares between processes
amply such that there shouldn't be a problem.

Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Svein Erling Tysvær" <svein.erling.tysvaer@...>
To: <ibobjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 1:06 AM
Subject: Re: [IBO] Kylix


> Agree with Carlos, knowing the normal IBO quality it sounds like great
> work. One question, though:
>
> >Instead of using a timer on the session to fuel things like automatic
> >Transaction OAT management I have designed and implemented an
architecture
> that
> >hooks you right into the IDLE cpu message notifications from windows.
This
> >produces much more fluid and efficient handling of background tasks that
IBO
> >relies upon happening.
>
> What if some of us actually followed the OT here some time ago and allowed
> www.ud.com to use the idle time of our computers for cancer research? I.e.
> low priority processes that "replaces" the System Idle Process. Will this
> mess up the entire transaction OAT management?
>
> (Only a theoretical question, www.ud.com isn't in touch with our internal
> network - and I've got a separate machine for the internet not using IBO.)
>
> Set
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>